New MBP’s Released Today.
February 8, 2008 is a day that will live in infamy.

Why? You ask.
Because that is the day I decided that I’d had enough of my piddly G4 Pbook, and bought a new MBP. 19 days later Apple releases a new line of MBP’s, and I’m screwed. Well, not really. The speed increase alone has made a huge improvement in my workflow, and I could not have done the last few jobs without the new machine. As for the new MBP, the only real improvements in the mid-level, 2499.00 machines are a boost in the graphics card from 256 to 512, and a HD increase from 160 to 250. It’s enough to make me want to cry, as my return date was Feb. 22, but I’ll get over it soon enough. Did I mention the sexy new iPhone like pinch and scroll trackpad? Okay, I’m crying again.
If you are looking for a new MBP, I would suggest spending the extra 50 bucks and go for the 7200rpm, 200 gig HD upgrade. My tests with both a P45 and a P25+ suggest that the 5400 rpm drive is okay for still life and architecture, but fashion capture requires the fastest config possible. 7200 rpm HD and 4gb RAM for starters would be nice.
As far as Leopard and capture apps, I’m finding things are working out okay. There’s still a fair amount of instability across various apps that haven’t been updated for 10.5, but that’s to be expected.
Annoying, but expected.
Both C1 3.7.8 and LC11.0.2 are working fine on 10.5. Minor glitches, one being half-processed files in 3.7.8 when you process by hitting the radio button in the process tab ( or so I think, haven’t been able to exactly nail where this is coming from) pop up here and there, but overall I’m getting along with 10.5 alright. If you don’t have to upgrade, I would wait a little longer for the stability to improve before making the switch.
Eric I is still out of town working on his tan and expatriate accent; nice work if you can get it. He’s more of a tech head than me, but I’m wondering about shooting to an external 7200 SATA drive through an Express 3/4 SATA card. Goes against all my rants about shooting to external HD’s, but I’m curious nonetheless. The throughput alone makes me think it could be worth a shot, but if any of you want to point out why it wouldn’t work please feel free to chime in. Eric I’s going to be so jet lagged when he comes to the happy hour it won’t be much fun at all to engage him on super-nerd talk.
See you on Thursday…



